Showing posts with label phillies. Show all posts
Showing posts with label phillies. Show all posts

Tuesday, November 3, 2009

Phillies hanging on by their teeth

Game 6, coming up.

The Philadelphia Phillies, facing elimination last night, hung on to win and force a Game 6 back at Yankee Stadium. I don't have a rooting interest in the Series other than the fact that back in July I predicted a Phillies dynasty. It would be fun to see this series go to seven games, especially since for the first time in a long time I believe the two best teams in baseball are actually facing each other in the World Series.

If it does go to Game Seven, the Yankees will have their ace, CC Sabathia, back on the mound. You gotta wonder if Charlie Manuel is regretting not pitching Cliff Lee on three days' rest so he could pitch three Series games. Instead, it looks like he'll send Pedro Martinez to the mound tomorrow night, and probably J.A. Happ if there's a Game Seven.

Can Pedro conjure up the same magic he did for five innings in Game 2? Against postseason hero Andy Pettitte, no less?

I can't wait to find out.

--Matt Kelsey

Thursday, October 29, 2009

Great game last night

Anybody else catch Game 1 of the World Series?

I don't have much to say about it, except to pass on an interesting statistic I heard during the broadcast. Chase Utley, a left-handed batter, hit two home runs off CC Sabathia, a left-handed pitcher, last night. The last lefty batter two hit two dingers off a lefty pitcher in a World Series game?

Babe Ruth.

--Matt Kelsey

Monday, October 12, 2009

'I got it! I got it!' See, how hard was that?

It's freezing cold outside, but at least we have playoff baseball to keep us warm.

The playoffs have been pretty good so far, including that one-game tiebreaker between the Twins and the Tigers which may have been one of the best baseball games I've ever seen. One thing that's disappointed me, though, is a lack of fundamentals by these teams, which are supposed to be the best teams in the league.

Take this, for example: how many times, just during these playoffs, have we seen near-collisions on popups because players refuse to simply CALL FOR THE BALL? I don't understand it. This is little league stuff. Call for the damn ball! We've also seen some horrendous baserunning, resulting in lost runs and lost games. Rockies star Troy Tulowitski just pulled his own baserunning bonehead play a few moments ago.

Fans of some of the losing teams may blame poor umpiring, and yes, there have been some questionable calls. The Twins were the victims of bad calls during their series with the Yankees. But it's not why they lost.

As a Royals fan who takes great pride in the team's 1985 World Series trophy, I always bristle when fans blame bad calls for lost ballgames. Cardinals fans still blame Don Denkinger for "The Call" in Game 6 of the 1985 series. These idiots forget, though, that the Cardinals also dropped a routine fly ball in that inning, and also runners advanced on a passed ball. (And, Jorge Orta was thrown out on the basepaths, rendering the negative effects of "The Call" virtually irrelevant.) And, of course, they also forget the 11-0 drubbing they took at the hands of the Royals in Game 7.

The Twins lost to the Yankees because of mistakes, plain and simple.

If Philadelphia can pull out a win tonight or in Game 5, we'll have the Phillies vs. the Dodgers and the Yankees vs. the Angels.

I'm rooting for Angels-Phillies. I think this would be the most entertaining series. Yankees-Dodgers would be interesting for the Joe Torre angle (and the first season in new Yankee Stadium). Angels-Dodgers would be good for the crosstown rivalry, and it would be cool to see the Angels win for Nick Adenhart. The best baseball would be played between the Yankees and the Phillies, though.

So any way it goes down we'll have a great storyline to follow, and a fun World Series.

Just call for the damn ball!

--Matt Kelsey

Thursday, July 16, 2009

The next sports dynasty

If I had to bet on which professional sports team would become the next so-called "dynasty," I'd put my money on these guys:



The Philadelphia Phillies already have the most recent World Series in the bag, based around a solid, solid group of core talent including Ryan Howard, Shane Victorino, Brad Lidge, Cole Hamels, Jimmy Rollins and the terrific Chase Utley. In the offseason they added Raul Ibanez, who is having a career year, and just this week they signed Pedro Martinez, who should help anchor the pitching rotation.

Now, it looks like the Phillies are the frontrunners to trade for Roy Halladay.

If they can do that - and if they can lock him up to a long-term deal - I think we have the makings of a dynasty.

It might depend, though, on your definition of a "dynasty." I think three championships in five years is a short-term dynasty; then you have the Yankees, who have established a dynasty over the past century.

The only problem with trading for Halladay is the Phils would have to give up a substantial amount of minor-league talent; that could effectively kill the dynasty in a few years.

So, I guess the Phillies GM has to decide: is a short-term dynasty now worth more than a long-term dynasty over the next few decades?

--Matt Kelsey